Current:Home > InvestProsecutors in Trump aide's contempt trial say he 'acted as if he was above the law' -InvestTomorrow
Prosecutors in Trump aide's contempt trial say he 'acted as if he was above the law'
View
Date:2025-04-24 16:53:04
Former Trump adviser Peter Navarro "acted as if he was above the law," prosecutors told jurors Wednesday during opening statements in Navarro's trial on charges of defying a subpoena issued in February 2022 by the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
Navarro, who under Trump was the director of the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, is being tried on contempt of Congress charges after he was indicted by a grand jury in June.
In his opening remarks Wednesday, lead prosecutor John Crabb said that the subpoena Navarro received from the Jan. 6 committee was a legal requirement and not "an invitation" or "voluntary."
MORE: Video Peter Navarro charged with contempt for defying Congressional subpoena
"Our system does not work if people believe they are above the law," Crabb said. "Congress legitimately asked for information."
Crabb showed jurors an email that Navarro sent to a committee staffer citing executive privilege before he was supposed to appear for testimony. The staffer, according to the email presented to the jurors, explained to Navarro that the "number of things the committee wanted to talk to [Navarro] about had nothing to do with Navarro's work as a trade adviser."
"He had to show up to his deposition ... to cite the privilege, he had to do it on a question-by-question basis," Crabb said. "That was made clear to Mr. Navarro. He didn't show up."
Navarro's attorney, Stanley Woodward, said in his opening remarks that he agreed with prosecutors that Navarro did not submit documents or show up for testimony -- but, he said, the Jan. 6 committee failed to contact former President Donald Trump to find out if he had asserted executive privilege over Navarro's testimony and document production.
"The evidence in this case will not show that Dr. Navarro was not willful in his failure to comply," Woodward said.
In subsequent testimony, David Buckley, a former staff director for the Jan. 6 committee, testified about the subpoena that was issued to Navarro, including the type of documents that were requested and the deadlines that Navarro was asked to meet.
Buckley said the committee was seeking to question Navarro about efforts to delay Congress' certification of the election, a plan Navarro dubbed the "Green Bay Sweep" in his book, "In Trump Time."
Navarro faces one count over his refusal to appear for a deposition in front of the committee, and another count for refusing to produce documents. If convicted on both counts, he could face a maximum of two years in prison and fines up to $200,000.
veryGood! (6185)
Related
- Audit: California risked millions in homelessness funds due to poor anti-fraud protections
- Can you make calls using Wi-Fi while AT&T is down? What to know amid outage
- ESPN's Kirk Herbstreit, Chris Fowler and more will be in EA Sports College Football video game
- What does gender expansive mean? Oklahoma teen's death puts gender identity in spotlight.
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- I'm dating my coworker. Help!
- Judge in Trump fraud case denies request to pause $354 million judgment
- Could gunowners face charges if kids access unlocked weapons? State laws differ
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Bad Bunny kicks off Most Wanted tour in Utah with a horse, floating stages and yeehaw fashion
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Trump sells sneakers and Beyoncé is a country star. Is this the quiz or 2024 bingo?
- Hilary was not a tropical storm when it entered California, yet it had the same impact, study shows
- Vermont governor signs school funding bill but says it won’t solve property tax problem
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Integration of AEC Tokens with Education
- A Kansas county shredded old ballots as the law required, but the sheriff wanted to save them
- Rob Kardashian Returns to Instagram With Rare Social Media Message
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Bobi loses title of world's oldest dog ever, after Guinness investigation
Utah man sues Maduro over trauma caused by nearly two years of imprisonment in Venezuela
Afrofuturist opera `Lalovavi’ to premiere in Cincinnati on Juneteenth 2025
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
This Is Your Last Chance To Save an Extra 30% off Michael Kors’ Sale Section, Full of Dreamy Bags & More
Alabama patient says embryo ruling has derailed a lot of hope as hospital halts IVF treatments
Hilary was not a tropical storm when it entered California, yet it had the same impact, study shows